From: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: FWD: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6 in Lilypond
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:32:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnt8qzgz.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czvwj230.fsf@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1223 bytes --]
Hi,
I’d like to ask again if anyone can help the Lilypond folks with setting
optimization settings for code they compile from lilypond-files:
> Are there ways to improve this? For example sticking to the baseline
> compiler (as described in the wingolog:
> https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/06/03/a-baseline-compiler-for-guile )
>
>>> The article linked above shows that setting -O1 as optimization of the
>>> code could help (if you’re not already doing that).
>
>> The article gives a pointer to the code, which is
>> module/language/tree-il/compile-bytecode.scm. I ran
>>
>> for c in $(git log module/language/tree-il/compile-bytecode.scm|grep
>> commit|awk '{print $2;}'); do git show $c ; done | grep -i doc
>>
>> to look for documentation, but couldn't find it. The module has one
>> exported symbol, which is compile-bytecode.
>>
>> Could you give some practical tips on how we'd use this?
>
> Can someone help with this?
>
> It would be pretty cool if there were a simple way to speed-up lilypond
> like changing optimization level that just got lost in communication (or
> missing docs).
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1125 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-11 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <878s6vaa7c.fsf@web.de>
[not found] ` <CAOw_e7b8-AAROs4SrB+E=fG=ORDdjgG_AbcWW2ytS1tHHmAGdA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <87v99wf1n0.fsf@web.de>
[not found] ` <CAOw_e7ZxEWWU6mxJx2cNgb4nyjXnw8ZtYCa+Lp_k=-2WkSpGCg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-18 8:30 ` FWD: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6 in Lilypond Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2021-03-18 17:21 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2021-04-11 21:32 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide [this message]
[not found] ` <f352b8c6-6a8b-4a6d-85ac-ec32cd33fc3a@t-online.de>
[not found] ` <e968a361-397e-8634-4521-ad1a4801b9de@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <cab2cdfa-6c45-c07e-8c5e-be3dde767281@t-online.de>
[not found] ` <CAGebFpKhKtQ2u6N2Le-fc1A4sp=9siHAbPkV4RCS6GOZ84YF+w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <11662b16-c4e3-6d48-7496-6914b35e9c8e@t-online.de>
2021-03-21 8:21 ` Fwd: Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6 Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnt8qzgz.fsf@web.de \
--to=arne_bab@web.de \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).