From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile' Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:10:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87veumvtls.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87u0a7tfex.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20060310064102.GA11885@esat.kuleuven.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142028891 24368 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2006 22:14:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 23:14:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHpsm-0007zF-Ar for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:14:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHpsl-00015i-1D for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:14:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHpse-0000uh-BK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHpsc-0000lD-FD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:14:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHpsc-0000kl-5C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FHpvy-0008M4-GQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-129-144-246.range86-129.btcentralplus.com [86.129.144.246]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E5E40A06B; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48646F7C2; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:10:39 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: steven mestdagh In-Reply-To: <20060310064102.GA11885@esat.kuleuven.be> (steven mestdagh's message of "Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5770 Archived-At: steven mestdagh writes: > Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]: >> >> Thanks. What is the Guile version of the existing OpenBSD port? > > it's 1.6.7. Thanks. >> (It's easy enough to fix the tests to use scm_with_guile instead, but >> I'm concerned that we've unintentionally removed scm_init_guile, as >> far as OpenBSD is concerned, without passing through any deprecation >> phase; so it would probably be better to make scm_init_guile continue >> to work.) > > i was planning to test build ports depending on guile, so anything that > uses scm_init_guile will error out. i'll let you know. Digging a bit further, this looks like it's caused by HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK not being defined. Can you confirm that when you run ./configure, it says that pthread_attr_getstack can't be found? Also, do you happen to know whether this function really is absent on OpenBSD? Perhaps ./configure just needs to try another header/library? Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel