From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Subject: 1.8 make check failing in popen.test
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:37:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vepora1r.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (raw)
Right now 1.8's make check fails here in popen.test:
Running popen.test
FAIL: popen.test: open-input-pipe: echo hello
However, it's a fairly strange failure. For example, if I run
./check-guile directly, everything's fine, but if I create a trivial
makefile containing "bar: ; ./check-guile" and then run "makefile -f
foo bar", the popen test fails again.
Also, if disable environments.test, everything's fine, i.e.:
mkdir test-suite/tests.disabled
mv test-suite/tests/environments.test test-suite/tests.disabled/
make check
However, if I put environments.test back and disable these tests
instead:
r4rs.test ramap.test receive.test threads.test
r5rs_pitfall.test reader.test regexp.test
then make check also runs correctly. So it's not specifically
environments.test.
By adding some display statements to popen.test, it looks like the
fundamental cause of the failure is the fact that in those cases,
(open-input-pipe "echo hello") is returning an empty port.
Does anyone have any idea what might be going on?
Also, while looking around, I noticed that many of our tests don't
place themselves in a their own test module, and that raised two
questions:
1) Should they (to limit the chance that one test might affect
another inadvertently)?
2) Is there any reason I shouldn't consider just reworking the
scheme level tests to run each foo.test in a separate Guile
process?
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-23 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-23 8:37 Rob Browning [this message]
2006-07-23 22:36 ` 1.8 make check failing in popen.test Kevin Ryde
2006-07-23 23:12 ` Rob Browning
2006-07-24 7:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-07-30 1:59 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-15 8:35 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-15 23:13 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-16 1:18 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-16 23:26 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-18 3:01 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-21 23:38 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-22 2:03 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-25 1:16 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-25 2:39 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-27 20:06 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-27 20:22 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-30 7:50 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-31 0:24 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-31 6:28 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-04 2:45 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-07 20:46 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-09-08 2:45 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-08 23:05 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-09-09 12:52 ` Marius Vollmer
2006-09-09 16:39 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-10 16:24 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11 1:16 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11 6:40 ` Neil Jerram
2006-09-11 15:57 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11 17:40 ` Neil Jerram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vepora1r.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org \
--to=rlb@defaultvalue.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).