From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64 Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:13:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87vemnca65.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <20061010063445.GA30335@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <87slhw60l8.fsf@laas.fr> <20061011110153.GA12594@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <87r6xdher1.fsf@laas.fr> <20061013062617.GD8294@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <873b9sfyx6.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160831672 18349 80.91.229.2 (14 Oct 2006 13:14:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, ldv@altlinux.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 14 15:14:29 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYjLM-0005xL-5H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:14:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYjLL-0004q1-JQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:14:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYjLH-0004no-Jm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYjLF-0004hZ-Sf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYjLF-0004hD-O3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GYjTr-0003fY-7B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-145-158-38.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.158.38]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD95B40AB72; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1683F6F6D4; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:13:39 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Stanislav Ievlev In-Reply-To: <873b9sfyx6.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:38:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6151 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > As for this: > > async.c: In function 'scm_i_queue_async_cell': > async.c:250: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with a= ttribute warn_unused_result > > I don't really understand what this code does, but I have the feeling > that line 250 could be rewritten this way: > > SCM_SYSCALL ((void)write (sleep_fd, &dummy, 1)); > > Can somebody familiar with this comment? Agreed. Stanislav, can you try this and confirm whether it removes the warning you are getting? Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel