From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Inlining `scm_getc ()' and friends Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:34:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87ve2ho7ya.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87iqyk9z9z.fsf@gnu.org> <87od8a4vfg.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87fxtm1ak3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208378362 5797 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2008 20:39:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 16 22:39:11 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmELM-0001pj-Aj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:35:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEKh-0000Yz-LV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEKb-0000Yk-Ky for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEKZ-0000YT-7L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEKZ-0000YP-4r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmEKU-0003r9-BU; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-183-175.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.183.175]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50241F67BF; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:34:05 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592DB3800D; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:34:05 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87fxtm1ak3.fsf@gnu.org> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:14:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7170 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Neil Jerram writes: > >> Would it also make sense to commit the benchmark? We already have a >> "benchmark-suite" directory. > > I had a quick look and it seems this directory would need a little bit > of cleanup (e.g., "#!../libguile/guile" does not work here, should be > substituted as for `check-guile', etc.). Thus I'm procrastinating that > for now... But why not commit the benchmark code anyway? If there are some benchmarks there worth running, the more incentive for someone (me?) to clean up the framework code! (I think it would be good if we could do more to track Guile's performance. I'll post about that separately...) Neil