From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: heads up: goops class export Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:03:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87vcvm8gia.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309519094 3366 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 11:18:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:18:14 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 13:18:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbje-00023Z-QS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:18:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbjd-0002pu-GK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcbjA-0002ke-J7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbj9-0002ta-1t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:39475 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcbj8-0002tU-MI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:17:38 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED146456B for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:19:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=V9sNdslBcGUAyGNcLdXnIUKiSxQ=; b=TGwkHv ukI9fjPmrgr3si7sCQR04tqkpKji6VSiifrw2WMIaUZLgl+Z3MDP74KCycoVbVM/ VihIK8tz9Q7rwE1WmqrMtGk0aLEuSPKTw9DdM4b7mxNANVrnFLpBS3SyC1lUXmEc qOvQz22B54dT1iKV3oTrdBHEtFEl+PX/q9u0Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CPIM8Me4LLW2bWW4xjcJjV50iG8rbbNp IiMdDgQGBk7ciDzKmWFXaFEo7ebkER9U/qOEjKBIAmmfPfN34ua4bVZQWK+Rj8nq ApNARtKWRgshfnJcu8drS/PqIUd+/A3wph4T+it4rTU6gdjXEkz6M9VqounkmfZh o7VBSD+PLGQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58FB456A for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:19:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 405304569 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:19:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Sun, 01 May 2011 22:32:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0A682522-A3D4-11E0-B9A6-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12619 Archived-At: Hi, On Sun 01 May 2011 22:32, Andy Wingo writes: > Currently when you define a SMOB type or set a name on a vtable, a > corresponding class is automatically exported from (oop goops). This > breaks modularity, and I think we should stop doing it in 2.2. > > I will make this change at some point, if there are no objections. I have made this change in guile-master. You can get at the class of a record type by grubbing around in (class-direct-subclasses ), but the real solution will be to make record type descriptors instances of . That will come lter. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/