From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile-lib 0.2.2 released Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:58:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87vca8l50s.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87a9rpwt0d.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359975515 2991 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2013 10:58:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Hartwig Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 04 11:58:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2JlH-0001Ji-1X for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:58:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2Jky-0005tJ-Hx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2Jkv-0005t7-S4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:58:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2Jku-0005t8-Cr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:58:33 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:39145 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2Jku-0005sz-9D for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:58:32 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9066B9984; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:58:31 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=kO8rCd5+WIeIfxDjD6TwnnkYN0Y=; b=Q57tbr GByUEwXLnlEuvii1XTQgm2ukTD7+unOPOYvG26GEcHxAP4ordBcGjJ7mF0aw7Z6x BvF0HQGwp2ZyEU+5KMNY+zHIPZxXbn2SSb4Lq8g2s/6m4cBOIMsAfiRLUo4XrA4b 0tbkoBEjFJjYUdIsSgXftqP/ln893O1j/Oze8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZjM9rVkFd1glXAATQHS3d3aKzL0TJJ5p E56koGupQo20hKNOq80s7RuwXjxQmM96tcRXwZEJn+S2Ec24xpM2f+IO8i0ZLc6g kac8gjW/q3CV5QXqX20RFx2NjKt8r9TWj5v5col2Dmef2GdzRA/oUPmSO6a0T9C2 xfQCAwAjfXU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862CA9983; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:58:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 121619982; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:58:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:07:55 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CFFD733A-6EB9-11E2-8579-0A4F0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15681 Archived-At: On Mon 04 Feb 2013 03:07, Daniel Hartwig writes: > On 31 January 2013 18:23, Andy Wingo wrote: >> Guile-Lib is intended as an accumulation place for pure-scheme Guile >> modules, allowing for people to cooperate integrating their generic >> Guile modules into a coherent library. Think "a down-scaled, >> limited-scope CPAN for Guile". > > Is guile-lib interested in receiving new code? Dunno! I'm not sure. Now that we have the guildhall starting up, I would be inclined to say "no". Better a decentralized repo than a poorly maintained centralized repo. Do you think guile-lib should accept new code? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/