unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: always O_BINARY?
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:39:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vc9ij5z0.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)

Hi,

Just thinking aloud here -- Windows has this O_BINARY thing that
translates CRLF to LF when reading, and LF to CRLF when writing.  It
seems to me to be a useless thing.  We already have our own i/o
abstractions and should deal with CRLF vs LF in Scheme, I think:

  The (newline) function can write CRLF
  The ~% format directive should DTRT
  read-line should DTRT

And since all of our hackers have been on POSIX systems, we're used to
there being no O_BINARY/O_TEXT distinction.

So, what do you think about always adding O_BINARY to files that Guile
opens?

Regards,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/



             reply	other threads:[~2013-02-24 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-24 11:39 Andy Wingo [this message]
2013-02-24 12:08 ` always O_BINARY? Neil Jerram
2013-02-24 16:55 ` Mike Gran
2013-02-24 21:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-02-28  3:24   ` Adding new information to scm_t_port (was Re: always O_BINARY?) Mark H Weaver
2013-02-28  8:53     ` Andy Wingo
2013-02-28 11:04       ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-02-28 13:09         ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-01  9:03           ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-05 18:55       ` Mark H Weaver
2013-03-27 20:00         ` [PATCH] Add private port structure, and move iconv descriptors there Mark H Weaver
2013-03-27 20:28           ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-27 20:51           ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-27 21:11             ` Mark H Weaver
2013-03-31  7:52             ` [PATCH] Add internal-only port structure; " Mark H Weaver
2013-03-31 13:20               ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-31 15:23                 ` Mark H Weaver
2013-03-31 22:06                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-04-01 18:57               ` Andy Wingo
2013-04-01 20:03                 ` Mark H Weaver
2013-04-01 20:54                   ` Andy Wingo
2013-04-01 21:04                     ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-31 19:44             ` [PATCH] Add private port structure, and " Mark H Weaver
2013-03-31 22:08               ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-04-01 19:04               ` Andy Wingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vc9ij5z0.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).