From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs Subject: Re: There is no returning Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:52:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87vbzva090.fsf@netris.org> References: <527A836E.4050100@gnu.org> <527FDEFE.2070503@gnu.org> <527FEF6D.3010402@cs.ucla.edu> <527FEBA0.7000303@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384415584 31544 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2013 07:53:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Harlan Stenn , Paul Eggert , bug-gnulib List , guile-devel Development , Andreas Metzler To: Bruce Korb Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 08:53:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vgrjg-0005J6-MQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:53:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vgrjg-0005gX-BP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgrjY-0005gD-EJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgrjS-0006e2-Jj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:44426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgrjS-0006dv-FE; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:52:54 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VgrjL-0000Su-In; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:52:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <527FEBA0.7000303@gnu.org> (Bruce Korb's message of "Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:25:04 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16724 gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs:33383 Archived-At: Bruce Korb writes: > On 11/10/13 12:41, Paul Eggert wrote: >> A better solution, if you want to be portable to >> MSVC, is to use _Noreturn instead of noreturn. >> This is for reasons described in stdnoreturn.in.h. >> >> '_Noreturn' is a bit ugly; if you don't care about >> MSVC, then __attribute__((__noreturn__)) is >> a good way to go. > > Hi Paul, > > Thanks. As mentioned in the GCC pages, using the prefix/suffix > of "__" is the right way to go -- for Guile. FYI, I recently made precisely that change to the stable-2.0 branch, which will become Guile 2.0.10: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commitdiff;h=36c40440078c005cd5e239cca487d29f6f60007d;hp=b1fe20c24ccb380420ea1ffdc7f249224072dcdc Regards, Mark