From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: MinGW patches Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:59:17 -0500 Message-ID: <87vbw7jfze.fsf@yeeloong.lan> References: <834n3x8o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <83y519788a.fsf@gnu.org> <871tz0d5vc.fsf@gnu.org> <83iosc76kz.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbwc72dp.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <8338jb4dao.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393084825 24414 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2014 16:00:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 22 17:00:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHF0C-00057W-TL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:00:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHF0C-0008JB-Ha for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHEzz-00088m-Qg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:00:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHEzu-0007K0-1b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:00:19 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:48534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHEzt-0007Jv-TA; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:00:13 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHEzn-0000OU-PJ; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:00:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8338jb4dao.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:06:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16915 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) >> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:32:34 +0100 >>=20 >> For convenience and to hopefully smooth the process, I=E2=80=99ve added = you to >> the Savannah group. Please post here for review before pushing. > > Thanks, but I have one question after reading HACKING: is it required > to rebase changes before pushing? Say, if I commit locally, then, > while waiting for review, someone else pushes to master -- can I then > push once the patch is approved, without rebasing it? We generally rebase before pushing, to keep the git history as linear as reasonably possible. Thanks, Mark