From: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Test for weak pairs in hash-for-each
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:06:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vbvkw4p8.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vbvotjr3.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 123 bytes --]
David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
Hello,
Updated patch attached that fixes a small style issue.
- Dave
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Test-for-deleted-weak-pairs-in-hash-for-each.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1660 bytes --]
From 1bbf073905bc12f80b0a32fc6311163a0b0ab849 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 17:15:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Test for deleted weak pairs in hash-for-each.
* libguile/hashtab.c (hash-for-each): Test for deleted weak pairs.
* test-suite/tests/hash.test: Add test case.
---
libguile/hashtab.c | 4 +++-
test-suite/tests/hash.test | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libguile/hashtab.c b/libguile/hashtab.c
index 9107ce5..44db051 100644
--- a/libguile/hashtab.c
+++ b/libguile/hashtab.c
@@ -1464,7 +1464,9 @@ scm_internal_hash_for_each_handle (scm_t_hash_handle_fn fn, void *closure,
handle = SCM_CAR (ls);
if (!scm_is_pair (handle))
SCM_WRONG_TYPE_ARG (SCM_ARG3, buckets);
- fn (closure, handle);
+ if (!SCM_HASHTABLE_WEAK_P (table)
+ || !SCM_WEAK_PAIR_DELETED_P (handle))
+ fn (closure, handle);
ls = SCM_CDR (ls);
}
}
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/hash.test b/test-suite/tests/hash.test
index 64d10bb..4c21d71 100644
--- a/test-suite/tests/hash.test
+++ b/test-suite/tests/hash.test
@@ -347,3 +347,15 @@
(pass-if (equal? 2 (hash-count (lambda (k v)
(string? v)) table)))))
+
+;;;
+;;; weak key hash table
+;;;
+
+(with-test-prefix "weak key hash table"
+ (pass-if "hash-for-each after gc"
+ (let ((table (make-weak-key-hash-table)))
+ (hashq-set! table (list 'foo) 'bar)
+ (gc)
+ ;; Iterate over deleted weak ref without crashing.
+ (unspecified? (hash-for-each (lambda (key value) key) table)))))
--
1.8.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-12 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-08 22:20 [PATCH] Test for weak pairs in hash-for-each David Thompson
2014-03-12 2:06 ` David Thompson [this message]
2014-03-12 6:45 ` Mark H Weaver
2014-03-12 13:41 ` Thompson, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vbvkw4p8.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=dthompson2@worcester.edu \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).