From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Gambda Logo Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87vba5zppe.fsf@T420.taylan> References: <561CD0BE.5080609@freenet.de> <562216FC.7070106@freenet.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445082154 22047 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2015 11:42:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Thorsten Wilms Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 17 13:42:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnPsc-0002zJ-MX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:42:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnPsc-0008Dd-1g for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnPsX-0008Cr-Et for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnPsW-0003M0-DF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:34153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnPsW-0003LX-70 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so39550876wic.1 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 04:42:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=wpZ0jm0xqYcJmnDZnZJlguf04SK+S0bNiVplfDlJ8pI=; b=Nv/Ki92pRNYViuw5n8/T9EBCmy5WbhOOXlXsQXxTbLwypREBQxn+j4CmhPHAqi8JSQ JKNuJ7T5H880oJqxRgMwallTzxIikITN4qJgSUOQOPJ5Nk3ZcpP/vSFrtpPyprP8PV+R QiHO6Es2PAaxLQAqi8qkn8jwLzlhgcCAGuVss9WwkqtTJVCcJMCgrdJg83SjzZ9a6th5 i5dGmkZvaUrtMGenVntWWreSgUkv9XboTVULYG3ri1JOhdpf1k4mFY6+5yklDHE3FZ6S PnTrT4Ot2hfc+qPwrTyNKdn492bA7C8qoopRZKvTxCBbPGbckq92988Otfn+Hydem+wD tixg== X-Received: by 10.194.113.33 with SMTP id iv1mr22201588wjb.65.1445082143427; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 04:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from T420.taylan ([2a02:908:c32:4740:221:ccff:fe66:68f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ly4sm27915264wjb.4.2015.10.17.04.42.21 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 04:42:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <562216FC.7070106@freenet.de> (Thorsten Wilms's message of "Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:38:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:17925 Archived-At: Thorsten Wilms writes: > I guess the silence (with the one exception, thank you Amirouche!) > means I should stop and go away, [...] No need to be so self-critical. :-) Personally I was silent because I found both nice in their own ways and could not decide. (Your second logo is definitely much nicer than your first though, IMO.) In the mail you originally posted, the logo it looked somewhat pixelated (needs more anti-aliasing?) but in this on-website comparison it doesn't have that issue so it looks very nice. And I have to say it looks almost like a somewhat better fit on the website, due to the rest of the site looking quite "organic" (due to the drawing, I think), and your logo too (due to the curvature of the lambda, I think), whereas the other logo looks a bit more "mechanic" and more bold (literally as well as figuratively). Not sure if my words make sense, describing feelings is difficult. All in all I find both very nice, but have a slight preference for your logo, at least when placed on the website. Taylan