From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Unintentional conflict in define-immutable-type? Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:37:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87vb8nxjoa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87610yfwes.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87oaepiuyu.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuzrcmvc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448656696 23502 80.91.229.3 (27 Nov 2015 20:38:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 20:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Rob Browning Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 21:38:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2PmP-0001J6-HT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:38:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58431 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2PmS-0002PN-Af for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2PmP-0002PH-GI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2PmL-0007io-FP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2PmL-0007ij-C1; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:01 -0500 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:38584 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a2PmJ-0001HR-TG; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:00 -0500 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 7 Frimaire an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87fuzrcmvc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:34:31 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18068 Archived-At: Rob Browning skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> The convention is indeed to use for the RTD. > > ...and so (just to clarify) the goops class for a record is supposed to > be <> by default, and you'd need to (define <>) yourself > afterward, if you wanted the goops class to appear more conventional? Yes, I=E2=80=99m afraid. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(srfi srfi-9) scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(oop goops) scheme@(guile-user)> (define-record-type (make-foo x) foo? (x foo-x)) scheme@(guile-user)> $2 =3D #> scheme@(guile-user)> <> $3 =3D #< <> 1c4b960> scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? <>) $4 =3D #f --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The proxy class is created by =E2=80=98make_class_from_symbol=E2=80=99 in libguile/goops.c (in 2.0.) Ludo=E2=80=99.