From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathieu Lirzin Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What's needed to get elisp updates into Guile master? Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:12:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87vb4yayri.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87egbo0zxc.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87d1r71rag.fsf@dustycloud.org> <8760wz14q9.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87io0yppbn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49uyxhb.fsf@dustycloud.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457377946 24397 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2016 19:12:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Christopher Allan Webber Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 07 20:12:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ad0Zg-0004Uf-Rv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:12:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad0Zg-0005na-0J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad0Zc-0005lx-GB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad0ZY-0000m6-FP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad0ZY-0000m2-Bu; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:40996 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ad0ZX-0003yJ-Pm; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:12:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y49uyxhb.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's message of "Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:06:18 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18208 Archived-At: Christopher Allan Webber writes: > Mathieu Lirzin writes: >> >> You should bring that on emacs-devel where most people seem to think >> that a 'git commit -m "..."' with the actual diff is self explanatory. >> :) > > I'm afraid to. The emacs list has had strong responses moving between > tremendous enthusiasm for the guile-emacs work to outright hostility. I > think there are only a couple of hostile people, but they are vocal. > I'd prefer to have the next stage of things merged before I reach out > again. > > But maybe I'm being irrational. I could probably still ask for help. I was implicitly referring to a current discussion on emacs-devel: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-03/msg00180.html Sorry for not giving the context of my sarcasm at first. Anyway, thanks for giving guile-emacs some love! :) -- Mathieu Lirzin