Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

>> Why should Wisp be a separate package when other SRFIs are made part
>> of Guile?  Your point about maintenance and evolving applies equally
>> to other SRFIs.
>
> That’s a good point.  Making it available as (srfi srfi-119) would make
> sense I guess.  I need to take a closer look…

That’s where the documentation and tests are located:

- test-suite/tests/srfi-119.test
- doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi::5666:@node SRFI-119

The language implementation is in (language wisp) because that’s in the
language search path.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de