From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: 23 Mar 2002 13:14:15 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016885789 5645 127.0.0.1 (23 Mar 2002 12:16:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16okRg-0001Sw-00 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:16:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16okRN-0005Ro-00; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 07:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.138.42.134] (helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16okNt-0005KM-00 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 07:12:33 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1244 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Mar 2002 12:14:15 -0000 Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:164 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:164 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > ok, if no one objects, i will delete devel/ from guile-core/ and move > its contents to sibling cvs module "devel". What about calling it "workbook" instead of "devel"? Ohter than that, I think it is a very good idea to move devel out of the sources into its own module. It doesn't make sense to have it in the branches. > when Evan posts the BUGS exploder script (or if i stumble on some > emacs keyboard macro, whichever happens first), we will use that to > create devel/bugs/, one bug per file therein. I have a slightly uneasy feeling about splitting BUGS into multiple files. CVS is not very good at moving or renaming files and we wouldn't have a centralized log any more. I don't see any problems with just keeping all bugs in one file. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel