From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Branch management Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:45:12 +0100 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87u0a1jtyf.fsf@laas.fr> References: <87irqltfyq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142325983 13831 80.91.229.2 (14 Mar 2006 08:46:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 14 09:46:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ59f-0004x4-Lg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:45:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ59f-0002kO-5G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ59d-0002kI-1a for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:45:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ59a-0002k6-Rk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ59a-0002k3-Me for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FJ5Dk-0000NS-8W for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:49:36 -0500 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.1/8.13.4) with SMTP id k2E8jDPW002053; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:45:15 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Neil Jerram X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vent=F4se?= an 214 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Neil Jerram , Guile Development In-Reply-To: <87irqltfyq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:48:13 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5784 Archived-At: Hello, Neil Jerram writes: > Just a heads-up: until I get to any work that isn't appropriate for > the 1.8 branch, I'm planning to make all my commits to the 1.8 branch > only, on the assumption that we will do something later to copy those > changes to CVS head. Personally, I've been tracking HEAD (with an own Arch branch) from before the 1.8 release and the fact that HEAD becomes abandoned in favor the 1.8 branch isn't very practical to me. Perhaps other people are in the same situation? > Has there yet been any post-1.8 work in CVS? If there hasn't, we > have more options for what that "something later" can be. I posted a few bugfixes, some of which haven't been applied yet, some of which were applied to HEAD, and some of which were applied to 1.8. :-) Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel