From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible? Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:01:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87tz1yrbyy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2bc5f8210906141243l630335e0o3fb771f22e94a962@mail.gmail.com> <87bpoq8mm5.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <86tz2dxo80.fsf@gnu.org> <87fxdwcdyv.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <861vpghzqu.fsf@gnu.org> <87y6roaygj.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <86my84gkh9.fsf@inria.fr> <871vp549k4.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87ljnds1zo.fsf@gnu.org> <874otyx2yh.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246309320 26577 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2009 21:02:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 29 23:01:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MLNz6-00074C-PH for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:01:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MLNz6-0000Vz-8z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLNz3-0000Vo-JN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLNyy-0000VD-6B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48275 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MLNyy-0000VA-1M for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46841 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MLNyx-0004av-De for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MLNyr-0007Qn-Mb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:01:37 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:01:37 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:01:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 Messidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uQnyph3G04kT1jvtkqh5cHTQrjY= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8800 Archived-At: Hello, Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> (I think we don't disagree on what `NEWS' should contain, but on whether >> Gnulib qualifies as "user-visible".) > > I would certainly agree that individual portability fixes should be in > NEWS. Is that what you have in mind? Hmm, indirectly, yes. I suspect it wouldn't be easy to list individual fixes, though we could at least mention those that were reported in the bug tracker. Thanks, Ludo'.