From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: upcoming patches Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:08:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87tyxvks72.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87aazo74zd.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255986568 24015 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2009 21:09:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark H. Weaver" , guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 23:09:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MzzTa-0005Vr-Sz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:09:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MzzTZ-0000CP-5b for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzzTS-0000C6-Rm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzzTN-0000Ag-FD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55890 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MzzTN-0000Ad-7P for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:35351) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MzzTM-0003lp-RG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-147-112-196.range86-147.btcentralplus.com [86.147.112.196]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3814C1F73BD; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:08:18 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id B202238023; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:08:17 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:24:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9528 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > Oh no, I haven't seen a new one either. I was just going to take a look > at the old one again and see how much work it needed -- because it's not > fair to Daniel to keep his work in limbo, IMO. True - but I thought Mark's patch was an orthogonal optimisation, and hence that Daniel's work shouldn't depend on it. Is that wrong? Neil