From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:45:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87tyendlf1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d3lff5ev.fsf@inria.fr> <87ei5stwn8.fsf@gnu.org> <87sju70zlj.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301345153 1073 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 20:45:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 22:45:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4JJq-0003mg-3H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:45:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32828 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4JJo-0004Kj-6F for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58879 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4JJO-00045H-Cb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4JJM-0002Yk-LZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.19]:60048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4JJM-0002Ye-Fj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from nixey (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: lcourtes) by smtp.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81D1944B91; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:45:07 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 Germinal an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87sju70zlj.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:17:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110013 (No Gnus v0.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 80.67.169.19 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12029 Archived-At: Hello! Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Hello, >> >> A few more thoughts... >> >> Andy Wingo writes: >> >>> On Fri 25 Mar 2011 18:58, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >>> >>>> "Andy Wingo" writes: >>>> >>>>> bdw-gc 6.8 compatibility (hopefully) >>>> >>>> Aarrrgh. The intent has always been to support 7.x only (bdw-gc.h has >>>> compatibility stuff for historical reasons), which is already enough >>>> work. ;-) The README and various responses we posted in the past are >>>> consistent. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>> >>> I think we've been sending mixed messages. >> >> Again, I don=E2=80=99t think so. > > What is the current best recommendation for libgc to use? 7.x. Best recommendation would be 7.2, which fixes several bugs, but it hasn=E2=80=99t been released yet, unfortunately. > (Note in particular that Guile doesn't build with one of the most recent > releases, 7.2alpha4. Really? What=E2=80=99s the problem with this one? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.