From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: anyone define port types? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:56:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87twgkp9lq.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87y492mnjp.fsf@pobox.com> <87pots9tag.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn37wtf2.fsf@pobox.com> <20160612092513.3eb1c8a3@laptop.homenet> <8760t5mthu.fsf@pobox.com> <20160619163327.36246706@dell.homenet> <8737o9kr3g.fsf@pobox.com> <20160619210912.48528ffa@dell.homenet> <20160620074503.6d06426b@dell.homenet> <87y460jou5.fsf@pobox.com> <20160620100157.530fc347@dell.homenet> <20160622234450.773f313f@bother.homenet> <8760t0qru7.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466672264 7342 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 08:57:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user , guile-devel To: Chris Vine Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 10:57:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0S8-0005q4-3R for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:57:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0S7-0003RJ-E6 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0Qx-0002Zf-4p for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:56:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0Qs-0006yc-WB for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:56:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:63591 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0Qk-0006uo-9I; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073EE205E0; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:56:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ris3P52+GSRUHzMpYMLEBlTxsQU=; b=dpKTlA PA66JOCpkfHEBuSX4yXZbQ1RiQosPC8WJVbucPVofPg+BXc4kDwe9digNVeUPkBi Q8lOMiSDGnviQ+SfUBhHTxpLjyDW/VjD/E3dlOwmqieU9Y5XuA/AHX85re+iL/6X hN4ooA27k9Oymo+y6bTDMNM7ehEbehrqaN7P4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MJLMk/ub7SsxEg809TSa2/G7l+IYi6Sg DVXKctq/osAGC4k0OfXnfTvCKD1moMhi63wNl/ODWqMJkq5o1hRo8CwxA13/w8ks wDSPIjicrQPguNbTaex7e1mZ96ou4DIAu7c+4WeDgHYy0I9epdICSzrVmLZCDk/O Dd1OdaDEaiU= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED840205DF; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:56:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 447AE205DE; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:56:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8760t0qru7.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:36:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 538045AA-3920-11E6-A78E-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.66 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:12689 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18395 Archived-At: Little typo: On Thu 23 Jun 2016 09:36, Andy Wingo writes: > The only drawback that I know of with the strategy of simply allowing > users to use Guile's I/O primitives (e.g., `read-line') and assuming > that they'll suspend when they block is that not all of the primitives > that you would like to you have been rebased on top of the ones s/you/use/ > implemented by (ice-9 suspendable-ports). So if you find such an I/O > procedure that needs to be rewritten to use put-string instead of > display, for example, then please do send a patch. Cheers, Andy