From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs_Vilanova?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Maybe missing features on guild Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87twav8xk4.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480083034 5893 195.159.176.226 (25 Nov 2016 14:10:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:10:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 15:10:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAHCr-00007K-Kv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:10:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46279 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAHCt-0007sd-Ko for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:10:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAHCo-0007sU-KI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAHCl-0007D3-5i for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from roura.ac.upc.edu ([147.83.33.10]:48568 helo=roura.ac.upc.es) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAHCk-00079a-Pg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from gw-3.ac.upc.es (gw-3.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.9]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAPE5FL7021397 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [84.88.51.85]) by gw-3.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C1661BC for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:15 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: guile-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 147.83.33.10 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18765 Archived-At: Hi guiler crowd! I have a project that uses guile as a scripting system, and want to provide both the scm sources and compiled go files as part of the installation. But I've found the following issues (using guile 2.1.4): * Argument --load-path for "guild compile" sets %load-path, but not %load-compiled-path. AFAIU, loading a .go dependency instead of a .scm one might make compilation slightly faster. * If my scm code depends on an external binary library, I have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH for guild to find it. Maybe it'd be a bit easier to provide an argument on guild to add a path to the binary library search path. Since this is platform-dependant, it might be more pain than is really worth it. Cheers, Lluis