unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:54:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tw7kviu6.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y3x3zt6v.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:31:20 +0100")

On Sat 18 Feb 2017 11:31, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:

> At this point you might ask yourself when 2.2.0 is coming.  The answer
> is, very soon!  A followup mail will propose a timeline and a list of
> blocker bugs.  I would like to aim for final prerelease in another 4
> weeks and a final release a week after that.

Ahem :)

I think that the 2.1.x series is ready to go.  There are bugs which we
should fix of course.  Some of those bugs can be fixed within the stable
series; some we can't.  Of the bugs that we can't, some we can punt to
the next stable series, but some are _release blockers_ -- bugs that we
need to fix before 2.2.0.

Release blocker bugs principally concern ABI.  For example the foreign
objects facility which was applied to 2.0 and 2.2 and then rolled out
from 2.0 because maybe it's not an interface that we want to support in
the future -- well that is still part of 2.2 and if we released today we
would indeed have to support it.  It's that kind of question.

So!  Release blockers.

 * Foreign objects.  In or out?  Let's start a subthread.

 * The approach to macro-introduced top-level identifiers: OK or no?
   Again a subthread would be the thing.

 * GOOPS: are there incompatible changes that we think are bad?
   Subthread :)

There are a number of other bugs that are also important
(reproducibility, broken REPL server) that aren't strictly blockers in
the sense that we can release a 2.2.x that fixes them.  Those are
interesting but unless you want to schedule _your_ work/resources to get
them done, they are not blockers, as far as I undersand things.

I propose to release a 2.1.8 on 9 March.  At that point I would like to
have all release blockers resolved one way or the other.  Then we can
release a 2.2.0 whenever, provided that 2.1.8 release actually compiles
:)

Thoughts?

Cheers,

Andy



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-18 10:31 GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta) Andy Wingo
2017-02-18 14:34 ` GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta), SOCK_NONBLOCK Matt Wette
2017-02-21 20:58   ` Andy Wingo
2017-02-18 17:40 ` GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta) Matt Wette
2017-02-18 17:48 ` Matt Wette
2017-02-23 18:54 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2017-02-23 20:04   ` Mike Gran
2017-02-23 21:06     ` Andy Wingo
2017-02-24  0:52     ` Break-when [was GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta)] Matt Wette
2017-02-24 14:02   ` GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta) Andy Wingo
2017-02-24 17:46   ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2017-02-26 17:57     ` Andy Wingo
2017-02-27 19:32       ` Mike Gran
2017-02-27 20:30         ` Andy Wingo
2017-02-27 23:00       ` Thomas Morley
2017-02-28  8:31         ` Andy Wingo
2017-03-05 16:54           ` Thomas Morley
2017-03-01 18:04       ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2017-02-28  0:04   ` David Pirotte
2017-02-28  1:49     ` Daniel Llorens
2017-03-02 20:54       ` David Pirotte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tw7kviu6.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).