From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [Patch] SRFI-13 string-tokenize is wrong Date: 06 May 2002 20:54:40 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87sn55xg27.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87bsc8oom8.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuuuxr0v.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020737899 4820 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2002 02:18:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 02:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Martin Grabmueller , guile-devel@gnu.org, haus@lambda.math.uni-magdeburg.de Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 174uYU-0001Fd-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 04:18:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 174sm8-0008Mo-00; Mon, 06 May 2002 20:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway43.dip250.dokom.de ([195.138.43.250] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 174ndD-0005xo-00 for ; Mon, 06 May 2002 14:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 18639 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 18:54:40 -0000 Original-To: Matthias Koeppe In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:583 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:583 Matthias Koeppe writes: > Marius Vollmer writes: > > > Thanks; and sorry for being nitpicky: can we be sure that isgraphic is > > the same as charset:graphic? > > We can't. That's why I wrote that TOKEN_SET defaults to "an > equivalent" of CHAR-SET:GRAPHIC. Err, I meant "can we be sure that isgraphic is an equivalent of charset:graphic?". I suppose it would be better to use the real charset:graphic but we would have to import it into C land. (time passes.) I have done this now in unstable, but not in stable. > The whole internationalization stuff is, of course, broken. Yeah, true. > BTW, when I tried to make an example of the described behavior, I > got a segmentation fault caused by an array being indexed by a > signed char (on Solaris 2.7 with the Forte compiler): Yes, we hit on a couple of these already. > Here is a fix: Thanks, applied! _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel