From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87slrd2ttw.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <200511301616.22258.bkorb@gnu.org> <87wthpkyan.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <43B69F41.6030509@xs4all.nl> <87hd8pb8o7.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87lkxy3abo.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877j9i31gc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87acebhf1o.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87oe2foubc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8764oc4boj.fsf@zagadka.de> <87y816d7s0.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138144496 16543 80.91.229.2 (24 Jan 2006 23:14:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanwen@xs4all.nl, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 25 00:14:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1XN7-0007fC-Jj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:14:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1XJa-0004nL-CD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F1X03-0003OD-8S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:50:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F1Wzx-0003MW-0X for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1WaF-0001WC-Fr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.35] (helo=smtp2.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F1Vq0-0000N8-4L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id DB571296BE1 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:34:56 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: (qmail 1392 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jan 2006 23:34:51 +0200 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <87y816d7s0.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:11:11 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5620 Archived-At: >> Hmm, what I'm trying to say here that "lazy" is not some standard, >> established terminology, and if we come up with something better, we >> should feel free to change terminology. > > Yes, that makes good sense. I can't think of anything better than > "pre-unwind", so I'll use that in all new names. I don't think it's > worth changing any preexisting names though, such as struct lazy_catch > - do you agree? I agree. > [...], so long as we don't have to worry about preserving source > compatibility for functions that have SCM_API but are not part of > the Guile API. And my understanding is that "part of the Guile API" > <=> "documented in the manual". Yes, exactly. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel