From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: top-repl priority of guile module Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:44:08 +1100 Message-ID: <87sleunz9j.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87ejrj2s79.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ejrfhn6o.fsf@laas.fr> <87odqjkx22.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ejrfnidd.fsf@zip.com.au> <87lklmacso.fsf@laas.fr> <87bqmew096.fsf@zip.com.au> <87vekmular.fsf@zip.com.au> <87tzzykztl.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <878xh9wocy.fsf@laas.fr> <87wt49hs4v.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167691454 19653 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2007 22:44:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 01 23:44:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H1Vt7-0001Of-GK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:44:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H1Vt7-0001kS-1u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:44:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H1Vt4-0001il-Kw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H1Vt3-0001hw-OC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H1Vt3-0001ho-HO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.231] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H1Vt2-0003c3-Cq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FB4109A0C; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:44:05 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2872.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.40.114]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59268C11; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:44:06 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H1Vt2-0001xe-Fs; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:44:08 +1100 Original-To: Neil Jerram Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87wt49hs4v.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:37:52 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6391 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > > Absolutely, yes. One day we should get to de-polluting the guile-user > namespace ... Document or hide. > Yes, except that I think Kevin's patch using process-use-modules is > even better, because it avoids needing the resolve-interface calls, > and also does the call-with-deferred-observers thing, which looks > appropriate here. I would have used `use-modules', but it objects to not being top-level, and as a macro you can't easily construct args for it. (One of the greatest downsides to all macros.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel