From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:15:20 +1100 Message-ID: <87sle89bav.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <45A2D83D.3060700@xs4all.nl> <87wt3vhmon.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87odp2jvg9.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169162163 13624 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2007 23:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 19 00:15:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7gU3-0004fP-Qk for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:15:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7gU4-0002TU-DZ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7gU0-0002Qc-HP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:15:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7gTz-0002Pn-NJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:15:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7gTz-0002Pe-Hp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:15:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.231] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H7gTy-0006wJ-Vb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:15:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056DE10D066; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:15:35 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2EA5.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.46.165]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBF78C10; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:15:36 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H7gTY-0001e5-Fn; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:15:20 +1100 Original-To: Neil Jerram Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87odp2jvg9.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:36:22 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6443 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > > (define coverage-trap (make #:behaviour cover-entry)) You don't have to use goops to get a trap do you? > guile-statprof does a better job of trying to mitigate the > latter factor, so is in fact a better current bet for profiling Guile > code. I expect there's a place for both extry/exit and prof style. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel