From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: %nil once again Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:10:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87skgsa0xz.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <4A5F2F8A.5040108@domob.eu> <8763drbv07.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <4A603E36.7080100@domob.eu> <87ab30bk8p.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <4A63778E.3010109@domob.eu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248034261 1299 80.91.229.12 (19 Jul 2009 20:11:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel To: Daniel Kraft Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 19 22:10:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MScig-00044g-90 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:10:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MScif-0006t2-90 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MScia-0006rZ-TM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSciV-0006pr-Km for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:10:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53141 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MSciV-0006pn-Df for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:36639) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MSciV-0000Xj-2v for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-152-99-133.range86-152.btcentralplus.com [86.152.99.133]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C451F7ECF; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:10:38 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FFC38021; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:10:32 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <4A63778E.3010109@domob.eu> (Daniel Kraft's message of "Sun\, 19 Jul 2009 21\:44\:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8892 Archived-At: Daniel Kraft writes: > Good, that sounds reasonable and is also what I suggest. If we are > one day able to actually run existing elisp code through Guile, we'll > find out if anything needs to be changed in order to get a usable > implementation anyways. Agreed. > BTW, I implemented also the function bindings of symbols using this > fluid-based dynamic scoping at the moment -- but on second thought, > there's no scoping at all for function slots (all are global), is > there? No, I don't think there is. `let' can't operate on function slots. Regards, Neil