From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Build problem & unrelated patch Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:13:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87sk50nt9x.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275833728 8695 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2010 14:15:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 14:15:28 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 06 16:15:27 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLGdG-0001Th-F7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:15:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53007 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLGd8-0004U6-Ad for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:15:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35148 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLGd3-0004U1-IS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:15:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLGd2-0004tN-6B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLGd2-0004tB-0t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLGcz-0001JA-DI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:15:05 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:15:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 Prairial an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:R239vX/tsgTvgEazmiSTHV7K4r4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10440 Archived-At: Hi! No Itisnt writes: > Recently I get a build failure on libguile/guile-procedures.texi: > > guile: uncaught throw to misc-error: (dynamic-link file: ~S, message: > ~S (libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4 file not found) #f) > > Which would appear to be because srfi/ is not yet built. Anyone get > the same problem? I'm not sure how to go about fixing it. If you type “make” at the top-level things get built in the right order, so you shouldn’t get this message. If you --disable-shared you’ll get this message because we don’t currently do the right Libtool magic to make static builds work. > Here is a patch that uses AM_SILENT_RULES > (http://www.flameeyes.eu/autotools-mythbuster/automake/silent.html) to > pare down build output, and also adds some files to .gitignore. I > think it's a good idea. I can live without it, FWIW, but if others want it, I won’t oppose to it. Thanks, Ludo’.