From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: more define-inlinable-related breakage Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:36:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87sjtlzy51.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302727046 6079 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2011 20:37:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 22:37:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QA6oT-0003sO-Ld for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:37:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47283 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QA6oT-0005uy-8F for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QA6oP-0005uh-OX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QA6oO-0005DQ-PN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QA6oO-0005DK-DW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QA6oM-0003on-RL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:37:14 +0200 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:37:14 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:37:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 Germinal an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.110015 (No Gnus v0.15) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ABgyj7JIciarfhRhYr18TvGAkK8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12251 Archived-At: Hey, Andy Wingo writes: > What should we do here? Here are a few options: > > 1) Require people to recompile all the time. Sucks. > > 2) Implement some sort of proper dependency management. Tricky, > because installing a new version of package A could force a > recompile of all dependent packages; tough to get right on a > package-management level. > > 3) Declare that private names referenced by macro expansions are > actually API that should not break. I guess the short-term solution is (3). Before 2.0.1 is out, what about amending 531c9f1dc51c4801c4d031ee80a31f15285a6b85 to keep a dash instead of a space in procedure names? As a side effect, we’ll get unused-toplevel warnings. These should be solved differently anyway [0]... Thanks, Ludo’. [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/9863