From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:44:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87sjcypoet.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> <87ehq8od4e.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87wr40s9yk.fsf@pobox.com> <87396onqi0.fsf@gnuvola.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342003797 5870 80.91.229.3 (11 Jul 2012 10:49:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Thien-Thi Nguyen , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 11 12:49:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SouUT-0000Cq-Bg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:49:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48934 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SouUS-0000xX-E1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SouUK-0000wD-AS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:49:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SouUC-0002F4-Md for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:55998 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SouUC-0002EQ-Dz; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61605B2CB; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:45:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ydTq6wYQRtrQmdmFDVhAKvlHPuY=; b=efvy6m d/Eod6j/z9Vi/zfCcS1++T9bweOLhT2SS1ZVnUKfgQmJCOkpjui58U+Sy40k1RMJ fCqVO4vv8FWd5jqFTQCQKBfewI4XeqOWufNIuwIGgKvLcGS/g4Xog9hTYchqad78 qWNZfYYw/Pyt3q/t8owGFsmryN8xdUbdIHRyQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=PV/eI78nJ9WQS5vInXSrSoXqnVHAkp+l VmRRMu23h0CjZzg0wkjv1v+H+awsAx/67H6II4f1wWmq2gsp/Qqbafvlr/K43jPR ZZIsRdS5bKkwBFxIPLu6Y0Kb+kwF13AVUrlUkgdy0pTwMOJVUp1S01RkFy9gnGa6 YZ6dSXDZJEA= Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F57B2CA; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:45:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [80.102.206.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1FE3B2C9; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:45:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:02:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 77C8B296-CB45-11E1-87B0-7EBD87E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14741 Archived-At: On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine writes: > I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this > documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready > to apply to stable-2.0. Cool. I applied the first one. When applying the rest, I got: /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//lineio.texi:12: Prev reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: `Eq? Hash Consing' has no Up field (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//gap-buffer.texi:12: Next reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//guile.texi:375: Menu reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: warning: unreferenced node `Eq? Hash Consing'. makeinfo: Removing output file `guile.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. make[4]: *** [guile.info] Error 1 As Thien-Thi suggests, it's probably good to filter out the @twerpcommentary etcetera in your next patches. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/