From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: discussion: serialize procedures and continuations Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:25:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87siq8slwg.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395606332 29499 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2014 20:25:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Chaos Eternal Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 23 21:25:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRoxh-0002Kp-GP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:25:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33316 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRoxg-00021y-JT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRoxQ-0001oB-Ew for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRoxK-0007ch-Cu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49211 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRoxK-0007cd-23 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E510781; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=l6neVnaE5mNzCYcth9vd6Kg00Y4=; b=bLSbDN c71euFZFI097jGZjQsbUapDMniaQM/R9SLB0Ncq2XiCSTIIfPVdAGAYed8Vhjht6 XOXsi2E1XoLdmVga6x0ZFg7vveb79zsf2fWWjBbN+aaiisMYwQXvbJnGci0BlbbK u7mqfL8lnq62gH5ovg6aVtEkb5HPj9bSrQBHA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YMDOcQjnmQyxi4pJYfnxrLjXa62I/vt6 d2aBuQLoEfxpku6Z4IgPML8/vlJF91tfknHUO4A8sN98WqX+lTl/5qT6FR9GPvnb NXwvhpRxIpVqchWgIz0UEZOs0xd/+vHYcf6HA1qwF6fTSTqnEJ09VgkHn79/JMiP 9S7evNC9cPk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C3910780; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5F771077E; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:25:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Chaos Eternal's message of "Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:47:52 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3F241BFC-B2C9-11E3-BAE6-873F0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16995 Archived-At: On Thu 15 Aug 2013 15:47, Chaos Eternal writes: > Hence, it is reasonable to expect a way to serialize the closures to > disks and/or remote machines over network. Agreed. Guile 2.2's compiler might be able to do this, with some modification -- take a closure and tree-shake out its dependencies, packaged into an ELF image. Similar to save-lisp-and-die in some ways. But that's a bit expensive to do; there should probably be a way of doing it at compile-time instead of at run-time. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/