From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Windows file names snafu
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:12:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87simm1wib.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83k37z65wr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:23:48 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> skribis:
> This issue is caused by code that treats file names like strings.
> That fails when the compared strings differ by their directory
> separators ('/' vs '\'). I bumped into this in a couple of tests that
> failed or even aborted with backtrace.
>
> A related issue is the file names passed to Bash via open-pipe and
> friends: Bash treats backslashes as escape characters, so commands
> start to fail in mysterious ways.
>
> For these two reasons, I think Guile should strive to keep file names
> in Unix-compatible form, i.e. using forward slashes as directory
> separators.
I see, makes sense to me.
> The patch below is just to show what I modified; if this approach is
> accepted, I think it would be better, at least for the C parts of the
> patch below, to have a function to do the job, and call it from each
> of the few places which I identified.
[...]
> --- module/ice-9/boot-9.scm~ 2014-02-15 01:00:33 +0200
> +++ module/ice-9/boot-9.scm 2014-06-29 18:15:07 +0300
> @@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@
> (or (char=? c #\/)
> (char=? c #\\)))
>
> - (define file-name-separator-string "\\")
> + (define file-name-separator-string "/")
>
> (define (absolute-file-name? file-name)
> (define (file-name-separator-at-index? idx)
That looks good to me, but I’m Windows-oblivious ;-) and I’d like to
hear what Andy thinks, because he did the UNC thing in the past. Andy?
Ludo’.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-29 16:23 Windows file names snafu Eli Zaretskii
2014-06-30 11:12 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87simm1wib.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mhw@netris.org \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).