From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:31:29 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r8mc1bge.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016837444 24331 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 22:50:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oXrw-0006KB-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 23:50:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oXrl-0005aO-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oXZf-0003Ck-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:31:51 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AF014E2; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:31:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB62E1F60; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:31:29 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Evan Prodromou In-Reply-To: <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> (Evan Prodromou's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:40:01 -0600") Original-Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:160 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:160 Evan Prodromou writes: > Well, then, if that's the case, I'd say go for it. > > HOWEVER, it seems that perhaps maintaining the current bug file format > (except, of course, splitting up bugs between files) might get one > "there" faster than hoping for -- or hacking on -- an RFC822 parser. Right, as a first pass, I just wanted to split the files based on the ^L chars and start with that. I also felt like this could be done pretty independently of the release, and in fact, I wasn't planning to work on any of this myself anytime soon. It just seemed like a good idea. (Editing two files with the same bug with different numbers is something I'm very likely to screw up.) When I get ready to release, I either include the current BUGS file, or the one from guile-bugs, depending on which one exists, and is more correct :> -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel