From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: new-model.text, please comment Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:34:24 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r8fxy6gf.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <871y80tn9r.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87elby23fl.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87sn0dr66s.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031949301 21339 127.0.0.1 (13 Sep 2002 20:35:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17px9V-0005XX-00 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 22:34:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17px9f-0006L8-00; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17px92-0006Ij-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:34:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17px90-0006IW-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.64.4.228] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17px8z-0006IO-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86FE17EA; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:34:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC6E32363; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:34:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87sn0dr66s.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "13 Sep 2002 22:22:03 +0200") Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1338 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1338 Marius Vollmer writes: > Yes, this is what I had in mind. Without this :module-barrier > statement, the compiler would have to assume that any call can > change the module setup (which will make a lot optimizations > impossible). Or we would have to have a different kind of module > system. > > We could have also use declarations to communicate the module > barrier to the compiler. I.e., the variable named > do-something-that-changes-the-current-module! has a declaration that > the compiler understands. OK, pretty much what I expected, just wanted to make sure. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel