From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Release now? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:06:48 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r89tlf07.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87of50tdcz.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <873cmbpyij.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <873cm9oe9k.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046373077 20377 80.91.224.249 (27 Feb 2003 19:11:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18oTQA-0005Fd-00 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:10:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTQA-0001pH-05 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTOn-0000q8-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:08:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTOB-0000RB-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl093-098-016.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.98.16] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTMn-0007yv-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B45613888; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:06:48 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77425D4E4F; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:06:48 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Greg Troxel In-Reply-To: <873cm9oe9k.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:54:31 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2000 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2000 Rob Browning writes: > /usr/lib/guile/1.4/libguile.so -> /usr/lib/libguile.so.9.0.1 > /usr/lib/guile/1.6/libguile.so -> /usr/lib/libguile.so.12.0.4 > /usr/lib/guile/1.8/libguile.so -> /usr/lib/libguile.so.14.0.2 Ahh, the potential fatal flaw -- where to the *.la libraries go, and how does this strategy affect the current ltdl? My guess is that until we get versioning for ltdl and so can have /usr/lib/libguile-foo-bar.la.2.4.1 so that ltdl can find the right one, we may not be able to use the strategy for the .so's above... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel