From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: min, max and nans Date: 07 Jun 2003 01:17:38 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r8666bjh.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87ade1t1p7.fsf@zip.com.au> <87d6ih5okm.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87smqxl1yq.fsf@zip.com.au> <87adcxkepj.fsf@zip.com.au> <87smqo7ks4.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054942085 28642 80.91.224.249 (6 Jun 2003 23:28:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 07 01:28:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19OQcr-0007RU-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 01:28:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19OQdX-0005ti-6h for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:28:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19OQYm-0003rB-UZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:23:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19OQUH-0002TX-Ti for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:19:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.dokom.net ([195.253.8.218]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19OQTv-0002Ft-Eq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:18:47 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip73.dokom.de ([195.138.42.73] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 19OQTu-0007EP-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 01:18:46 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 16290 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Jun 2003 23:17:39 -0000 Original-To: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2509 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2509 Mikael Djurfeldt writes: > In my opinion, the idea of sending build logs at failure (not when > Guile compiles and tests OK) to guile-cvs@gnu.org is an excellent > idea. > > If I have at any time been critical against it, it was because it is a > good idea to start off with no build failures so that people feel > motivated to fix things. Hehe, yeah, I could totally understand your point (if I understood it ;-). For those interested: the snapshots were failing for over a week due to problems in the build environment (I think). I didn't get around to fix the build environment in a timely manner and so people saw error logs that were not relevant to them. That could only teach them to ignore these logs. So I stopped posting them automatically. We _did_ start off with no build failures but that was hard to notice since no logs are sent when there is no build failure. I think it is also OK when just I myself watch the logs and contact the people that I deem responsible for failures. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel