From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS versus error Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:44:43 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r82bxbx0.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87el0028c2.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ekyf9g50.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064101645 9522 80.91.224.253 (20 Sep 2003 23:47:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mikael Djurfeldt , guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 21 01:47:23 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A0rRj-0004Vf-00 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:47:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A0rQa-0003VI-Ko for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 1A0rPb-0003Sd-4L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 1A0rPQ-0003Ct-95 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.36] (helo=snoopy.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A0rPI-00037s-NT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mongrel.pacific.net.au (mongrel.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.107]) by snoopy.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id h8KNio4R012998; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:44:50 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp24.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.24]) by mongrel.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id h8KNgRXY010139; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:42:29 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A0rP9-0001in-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:44:43 +1000 Original-To: Marius Vollmer Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87ekyf9g50.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:58:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2814 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2814 Marius Vollmer writes: > > Right now (if I'm still uptodate), only one thread can > execute 'in Guile', Oh, I thought you'd said previously there could be concurrent such threads. (I'd meant to try to work up a section for the manual on such things.) > Yes. I realized since posting, that time() on a DOS system might be affected by the TZ changes made by the other stime.c functions. I guess all that stuff ought to change to use a little mutex controlling access to TZ. getenv/putenv would have to cooperate with that too so a mere temporary change is not seen or overridden. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel