From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-core in Arch archive Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:31:25 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r7vyfm36.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> References: <200403032038.07053.clinton@unknownlamer.org> <87brn9gajl.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <200403101734.20971.clinton@unknownlamer.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1079178012 31803 80.91.224.253 (13 Mar 2004 11:40:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 12:40:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B27Us-0002je-00 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 12:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B21lB-00086e-9A for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:32:33 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B1ypZ-0000kV-BW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B1jEF-0005EM-4o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:45:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B1jE8-0005Dc-P0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B1jE3-00035j-00 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from chello212186006140.401.14.univie.teleweb.at ([212.186.6.140]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from a.rottmann by chello212186006140.401.14.univie.teleweb.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:45:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 50 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: chello212186006140.401.14.univie.teleweb.at User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cek1+7vXFhULyr4CjkKBdrxm2tI= X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3517 gmane.lisp.guile.user:2938 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3517 Clinton Ebadi writes: > On Saturday 06 March 2004 12:17, Andreas Rottmann wrote: >> First, I'm happy to announce the availibility of an Arch "mirror" of >> the Guile CVS. It's located at: >> >> http://people.debian.org/~rotty/arch/rotty@debian.org/guile-2004/ >> >> In the category guile-core, there is a cvs-trunk branch, which will >> follow CVS HEAD. I might one day start auto-building Debian packages >> for experimental from that (and maybe other branches). >> patch-2 >> Applied extended -e patch by Clinton Ebadi >> >> patch-3 >> Applied getopt-long patch by Clinton Ebadi > > You may want to undo the extended -e patch; I had forgotten that > Guile CVS now reads the argument to -e and the (@ (module) > procedure) syntax provides an easy enough way to do things. Maybe > ttn's extended syntax could be supported with another option (-m?) > or somehow supported by -e for compatibility with his 1.4.1.x tree > (I don't really see how that would work, since (foo bar) could be a > procedure call that returns the entry procedure). > I think I'll open an --integration branch, into which I'll cherry-pick the features that are somewhat approved by the Guile developers. So far, from what I've heard from Marius, getopt-long would be a good candidate for that. Also, I think there should be somewhat detailed ChangeLog entries for the changes, so judging the changes is easier. >> You might consider branching off that and I'll star-merge your changes >> back in, which lowers effort for both off us (just make sure you >> commit clean changesets, as you've done now). > > Never a better time than the present to learn how to use arch. > If you have any questions wrt. to using Arch/the archive, don't hesitate to ask me (not that I'm an Arch guru yet, but at least I got some experience). Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Say NO to Software Patents! -- http://petition.eurolinux.org/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel