From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: typechecking Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:16:38 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r7snjsm1.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <16486.52591.672130.224861@localhost.localdomain> <87brkwc6f7.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87k6zkj6o2.fsf@actron.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086884262 13780 80.91.224.253 (10 Jun 2004 16:17:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanwen@xs4all.nl, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 18:17:28 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYSF6-0003yw-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:17:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYSFn-0000Uh-GJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYSFg-0000UQ-Ez for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYSFf-0000UE-KG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYSFf-0000U4-IJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BYSEM-0005JP-0p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.138.44.60] (helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1BYSHU-0000iA-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:19:56 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 25503 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Jun 2004 16:16:38 -0000 Original-To: dsmith@actron.com (Dale P. Smith) In-Reply-To: <87k6zkj6o2.fsf@actron.com> (Dale P. Smith's message of "Mon, 10 May 2004 17:47:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3784 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3784 dsmith@actron.com (Dale P. Smith) writes: > I thought that STRICTNESS == 2 was for extreme type checking, but for > suboptimal code, and that Guile code should always be able to be > compiled at level 2. Yeah, in an ideal world... :-) -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel