From: Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
Subject: doc eq? eqv? equal?
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:26:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r7q2a9c8.fsf@zip.com.au> (raw)
I'm looking to polish the docs for eq?, eqv? and equal? a bit. r5rs
says numbers are unspecified for eq?, even going so far as to say
(let ((n (+ 2 3)))
(eq? n n)) => *unspecified*
I guess that's meant to allow something wild and strange to represent
numbers.
In guile "(eq? x x)" is always going to be true, but I'm wondering if
the docs should describe only the weaker r5rs behaviour, and advise
eqv? for anything involving numbers.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-20 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-20 1:26 Kevin Ryde [this message]
2004-08-20 10:26 ` doc eq? eqv? equal? Marius Vollmer
2004-08-22 1:54 ` Kevin Ryde
2004-08-24 17:24 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-09-02 1:24 ` Kevin Ryde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r7q2a9c8.fsf@zip.com.au \
--to=user42@zip.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).