From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i18n patch ok? Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:25:48 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r7ou9hkj.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <871xh6m1t9.fsf@peder.flower> <877jqnteq1.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87r7ou5oci.fsf@peder.flower> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095884778 26571 80.91.229.6 (22 Sep 2004 20:26:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 22:26:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CADgj-0000Rd-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:26:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CADmj-0006cG-1H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:32:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CADmg-0006bz-Ki for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CADme-0006bD-Sl for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CADme-0006b9-Qp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CADgU-0004Zv-QA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:25:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.253.15.201] (helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CADgT-0007Yu-P8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:25:50 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24090 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Sep 2004 20:25:48 -0000 Original-To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen In-Reply-To: <87r7ou5oci.fsf@peder.flower> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:13:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4146 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4146 Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: >> I see that the FSF has sufficient papers from you, but Bruno has not, >> as far as I can see. So I need to known which portions were written >> by Bruno before I can commit the patch. Could you tell me this? > > That would already be a bit of work; we both enhanched each-others > versions twice. My guess would be that Bruno wrote about half of it, > so we should ask Bruno about his papers. Ok, no need to separate your contributions, I will askBruno for the papers. >> Also, we need documentation for the new functions, but it is not in >> the patch. Could you post a patch for the documentation also? > > Where should I look for inspiration? It was my impression that docs > were generated from the code. Only semi-automatically. We can keep docstrings in the source and the manual synchronized, but there first needs to be something in the manual that can then synchronized. Look into doc/main/docstring.el if you want to know more about this. I can get this started and then you flesh it out, adding general prose about gettext to go with the docstrings, OK? -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel