From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Another load path idea Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87r7691l6g.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <877j9cnoh4.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87oe2hss4d.fsf@laas.fr> <87mzi1jq8j.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87psmobmju.fsf@laas.fr> <87veweeyyk.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <1137944316.15250.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87fynaagju.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87irs68uie.fsf@zip.com.au> <87zmlit5e2.fsf@laas.fr> <87ek2tjidb.fsf@zip.com.au> <87vew22i86.fsf@laas.fr> <87zml7jcok.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87zml0mgeh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139714591 9795 80.91.229.2 (12 Feb 2006 03:23:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 04:23:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F87pI-0007LC-Re for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:23:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F87pH-0004Cs-Uf for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F850W-0005Hk-2S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:22:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F850E-0005Fj-1L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:22:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F850D-0005Fa-FD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:22:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.37] (helo=smtp1.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F8545-0003Y9-75 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp1.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id A0A667FC4A for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:21:38 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: (qmail 19383 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Feb 2006 02:21:27 +0200 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <87zml0mgeh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:22:14 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5676 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > I'd personally like to have this in 1.8. Any objections? Hmm, I'm inclined not to put this into 1.8, at least not in 1.8.0. I can't really put my finger on it, as I see nothing fundamental wrong with the patch, but I also don't see the immediate need for it. That is probably because I haven't followed the whole load-path idea discussion closely. So, I'd like to not put this into 1.8 and wait until more than the "first minimal step" is available and then consider whether to put it into the 1.8 series at that point. Ok? -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel