From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:58:58 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87r6xdher1.fsf@laas.fr> References: <20061010063445.GA30335@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <87slhw60l8.fsf@laas.fr> <20061011110153.GA12594@basalt.office.altlinux.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160658178 5718 80.91.229.2 (12 Oct 2006 13:02:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 12 15:02:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY0CK-0000Zf-Nr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:02:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY0CK-0006qc-2s for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GY0C4-0006mc-T9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GY0C3-0006m7-7K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY0C2-0006lx-Mr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GY0KG-0000z8-6p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.7/8.13.4) with SMTP id k9CD1d6j024733; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Stanislav Ievlev X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vend=E9miaire?= an 215 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Stanislav Ievlev , guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20061011110153.GA12594@basalt.office.altlinux.org> (Stanislav Ievlev's message of "Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:01:53 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6148 Archived-At: Hi, Stanislav Ievlev writes: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Stanislav Ievlev writes: >> >> > : In expression (vector-length syntmp-x-1008): >> > : Stack overflow >> >> Did you compile with `-O0'? If so, make sure you compile at least with >> `-O1'. > You have problems with optimization disabled? Personally, no. ;-) But Guile eats up a lot of stack space when compiled with `-O0', to the point that you can't get to the REPL (with the default stack limit), hence my suggestion to use `-O1'. > However, guile does not build with glibc >=2.4 when -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is > added to CFLAGS: I was unaware of that flag. Is it documented somewhere? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel