From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: trace examples broken in master Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:07:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87r5uty5qh.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <2bc5f8210907091222v6d3a3b8cqd91050a02b9d4f9c@mail.gmail.com> <87r5wj6626.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251626890 9357 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2009 10:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Julian Graham Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 30 12:08:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MhhKM-0006As-96 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:08:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55472 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhhKL-0005AM-HN for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhhKI-0005AH-6Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:07:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhhKD-00059W-JK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:07:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50473 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhhKD-00059T-Bg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:60492) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MhhKC-0005cC-Ll for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-152-99-133.range86-152.btcentralplus.com [86.152.99.133]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23561F6C5B; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:07:51 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275B38021; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:07:50 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87r5wj6626.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Tue\, 14 Jul 2009 09\:07\:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9203 Archived-At: Hi Julian! Neil Jerram writes: > You're completely right. The version stuff is historical and no > longer needed in master, so we should definitely blow it away. In > fact the same applies to the whole existence of > ice-9-debugger-extensions. (It was all about wanting to support 1.6 > and 1.8 from a single set of guile-debugging sources.) [...] > but the right thing to do is to fix the scm_set_source_properties_x () > code. This should all be fixed in master now. Can you have a go and let me know if you still see any problems? Thanks! Neil