From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Building Guile 1.9.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:37:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87r5u4c4tm.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87iqgpkyzv.fsf@gnu.org> <1250374829.3160.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87vdjgc6hb.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253309869 28242 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2009 21:37:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 18 23:37:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mol9A-0001xI-Ue for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:37:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mol9A-0005bD-38 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mol95-0005YY-Kv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mol8z-0005VL-Po for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43811 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mol8z-0005Uf-H8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:34773) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mol8y-0003aC-3p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-147-112-99.range86-147.btcentralplus.com [86.147.112.99]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB6D1F66F9; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:37:26 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id F108B38023; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:37:25 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87vdjgc6hb.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:01:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9355 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: >> It was a bit >> of a shock to see all the information about turning autocompilation off >> repeated once for each of the ~50 scheme scripts that make up its test >> suite, though. > > Yes. It would be better if the information was only issued once per > Guile run. Andy, any objection if I work on that? Actually I think I misunderstood what you meant, Mike. It looks like the autocompilation warning is already issued only once per Guile run. Neil