From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:45:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3bmg90v.fsf@pobox.com> References: <834m8i3off.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466765188 13238 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2016 10:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ludo@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 24 12:46:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGOci-0006mx-Fy for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:46:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42574 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGOch-0007qw-Er for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGOcT-0007qq-TN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGOcS-0000G2-OS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:64225 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGOcN-0000FB-G1; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:45:47 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19701C94A; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:45:44 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/+ywrnR/QIlHAyJaZRWeKvxKYd8=; b=LuZmzK g2jgX5pwhL4ex41k4e6TBk7C/jATlMEsygsVgnjmT6P/BDj8ZtPYTmFea54uS+MC 2BKjId+y+Cl15h9IBNvPu617GPAzQ/9uueRhhF0gPflsYBcHRy06s66g3mmA/v4U s4mS5Pu+Cw4ZBuKJHr0nUqb+HcyiHH9TQJnDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qlE7gf/1fWTE05E/rGVHyshHpHLmtgq6 SHzXsx+1RN2ZOv+vG8wrEgzUBsAne5bqlHwGQn2hkP91MGxW30OPAnbuywAKlVDm Op9AJ+6AXAoleZ2ycH7iE3zXZ16tSVKi7JzfRKBTfIf7v56BsNYNH9hfoZ0xLrl1 YLKB4aFYM38= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94AB1C949; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:45:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAF211C948; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:45:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <834m8i3off.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:51:16 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CD6C3670-39F8-11E6-849B-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.66 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18412 Archived-At: On Fri 24 Jun 2016 11:51, Eli Zaretskii writes: > This is a re-spin of the patches last posted here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-08/msg00015.html > > At Andy's suggestion, I've removed most of the Windows-specific code > to the new Windows-specific file w32-proc.c, leaving just the minimum > changes in posix.c itself. The patch below is against the stable-2.0 > branch in the Guile Git repository. > > I hope we will be able to get this into the repository this time. Thanks! I think it looks pretty good. I wouldn't mind committing as-is. I would like to hear what Ludovic or Mark thinks before doing do; WDYT? Andy