unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: autogen.sh now requires workbook specification
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:00:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pu1kdndl.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16rokn-0007Oc-00@giblet> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:28:53 -0800")

Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@giblet.glug.org> writes:

> basically, if you do "cvs co hack" this is handled w/o changing
> autogen.sh invocation.  if you keep workbook in another place,
> you need to invoke like:
>
> 	autogen.sh /path/to/workbook

Hmm, so checking out "hack" gets us a subtree like this:

  hack/core
  hack/scripts
  hack/workbook

and autogen.sh just looks up one level?

This made me wonder about having multiple trees checked out.  For
example, I always keep a core-1.5 and a core-dev tree checked out and
jump back and forth between them.  If scripts and workbook are
supposed to be guile version independent, then am I right in presuming
that I should probably just not use the "hack" module and manage my
tree by "hand". i.e. just have separate checkouts for

  guile/core-1.5
  guile/core-dev
  guile/scripts
  guile/workbook

Also, if scripts and workbook are supposed to be "core independent",
people will need to be careful not to accidentally tag them together.

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD

_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-01  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-31 23:28 autogen.sh now requires workbook specification Thien-Thi Nguyen
2002-04-01  5:00 ` Rob Browning [this message]
2002-04-01  5:17   ` Rob Browning
2002-04-01 19:29     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2002-04-01  7:37   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pu1kdndl.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org \
    --to=rlb@defaultvalue.org \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).