From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?) Date: 27 Aug 2002 00:04:21 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ptw55lay.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030399817 25843 127.0.0.1 (26 Aug 2002 22:10:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neil Jerram , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17jS3s-0006iJ-00 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:10:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17jS5B-0001xE-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17jRyC-0000mh-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17jRyA-0000mM-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip39.dokom.de ([195.138.42.39] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17jRyA-0000m2-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 25502 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Aug 2002 22:04:21 -0000 Original-To: Dirk Herrmann In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1161 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1161 Dirk Herrmann writes: > > There still is. In this case, and assuming that both modules have > > been loaded, there is a variable named `c' in (a b) whose value is the > > module (a b c). > > Is this just historical cruft? I would say so. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel