From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Cc: owinebar@free-expression.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs
Date: 04 Sep 2002 19:30:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ptvtjhhl.fsf@becket.becket.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209050238.TAA19359@morrowfield.regexps.com>
Tom Lord <lord@regexps.com> writes:
> And, again, I'm talking a little bit pie-in-the-sky. Should Guile
> never undertake to change its core away from (for example)
> conservative GC, if it converges on a nice API, then it is simply an
> implementation optimized for that particular API. #f/() is the only
> irreconcilable issue I know of in this regard. (Please, tb, spare us
> a rehearsal of jimb's design -- we all either agree with me, know i'm
> wrong, or already know the arguments. Ok, now, please say something
> argumentive *anyway*.)
What "reconciliation" is needed?
Who does guile have to reconcile with?
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-05 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-02 20:52 Threads and asyncs Marius Vollmer
2002-09-02 21:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 21:53 ` Marius Vollmer
[not found] ` <87bs7ggiss.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
2002-09-02 22:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-02 23:02 ` Rob Browning
2002-09-02 23:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:36 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:52 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 0:57 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 1:29 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:31 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:00 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 1:28 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:23 ` RnRS process/history/documentation (was Re: Threads and asyncs) Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 1:27 ` Threads and asyncs Rob Browning
2002-09-03 1:45 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:48 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-04 23:46 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 0:20 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 1:45 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 2:38 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:30 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG [this message]
2002-09-05 2:43 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:40 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 3:00 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:57 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 3:23 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 3:14 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 4:00 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 3:51 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 4:01 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 22:03 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 1:34 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 18:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-04 0:28 ` NIIBE Yutaka
2002-09-04 18:02 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-04 22:30 ` NIIBE Yutaka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ptvtjhhl.fsf@becket.becket.net \
--to=tb@becket.net \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=owinebar@free-expression.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).